In its target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 50 to 55% by 2030, the European Green Deal acknowledges the need to stimulate renovation across the entire EU building stock. In its commitment to “leave no one behind,” the deal promises to “tackle certain segments first”. Data from the European Commission show that the greatest need for investments in energy renovations is — by far — in the residential sector.
The Commission intends to announce the details of a “renovation wave” in the autumn of 2020. Considering the anticipated level of investment needed, scaling up mechanisms to successfully prioritise deep energy renovation is critical. The good news, according to the Commission, is: we have the money, money, money.
STRONG POLICY SETS THE STAGE, STRATEGIC FINANCING WILL PLAY THE LEADING ROLE
The second policy objective for EU Regional Policy funding is to ensure “a greener, low-carbon Europe”, including promoting energy efficiency.
With EU-wide deep energy renovation estimated to carry a cost of €200 billion a year for the next 30 years, the question of how to finance it quickly — and with the biggest possible impact — comes to the fore. The Commission is backing up this overarching policy aim with strategies to optimise different finance streams including from the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund, both of which can be used at regional and local level to stimulate energy-efficient renovations of public and residential buildings.
In parallel, the European Investment Bank (EIB) is, with its new Energy Lending Policy (ELP), making the transition to become the European Climate Bank. It aims at activating more public sector loans that will stimulate more engagement by commercial banks and private sector investment into renovation of buildings. Energy efficiency in buildings gets specific attention where the EIB clearly states that reducing energy demand through energy efficiency projects will help to support security of supply.
Recognising that energy efficiency investment, notably in residential buildings, needs to double by 2030, the EIB is taking strong measures, such as financing up to 75% of eligible capital expenditures. The Bank will work to support the Renovation Wave announced by the Commission.
The EIB will also strengthen its dialogue with EU Member States by hosting Energy Finance Workshops to explore how its lending and advisory services can better support the implementation of National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs).
The European Local Energy Assistance (ELENA) facility by the EIB provides valuable grants to support national capacity building on energy efficiency, a key element to establish national renovation platforms and projects. Since 2009, ELENA has awarded €130 million, triggering €5 billion additional investments.
Also, directing carbon revenues from the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) into energy efficiency action warrants serious consideration according to a (RAP). Against the use of straightforward price mechanisms to promote emissions reductions, delivers seven to nine times greater emissions reductions (Figure 2). Recent trends show carbon revenues increasing and potentially reaching €200 billion in the period 2021 to 2030. Countries such as Germany and Czechia have demonstrated the validity and effectiveness of this approach.
Graph: Based on data from the Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP)
CZECHIA UNDER THE SPOTLIGHT FOR A SUCCESSFUL RENOVATION PROGRAMME
Over the past ten years, Czechia has built up its New Green Savings programme, which now performs well to support homeowners to carry out deeper renovation. The programme has been revised and improved several times over the period to efficiently support deep renovation. It now covers all types of buildings, in all regions, from small-scale and do-it-yourself projects to those that are very large and complex. Importantly, it offers technical assistance across all related areas. Since 2014, the programme has distributed €440 million to approximately 51,800 completed or ongoing projects. This means the programme has been implemented in virtually every city and town.
The Czech experience highlights the need to avoid uncertainty about what is eligible, funding levels available or duration of the scheme. On a project level, pre-determining the amount of the subsidy provides certainty for the beneficiary and the state while establishing a fixed subsidy amount (30-50%) helps ensure projects are not overpriced. To encourage deeper renovation, the level of subsidy increases when a combination of ambitious measures is planned from the outset. The programme also offers support for project preparation, which can be substantial for large works. Providing application support has also proved to be an efficient tool to encourage applicants to aim for a deeper renovation to get a higher subsidy.
Finally, ongoing communication and assistance are vital to the success of the Czech programme, not only to reassure the public and operators in the renovation sector, but also to convince different politicians to sustain and enhance the programme. At present, EU ETS revenues provide sufficient resources to finance the programme and, thanks to its high visibility, no one in Czechia questions the important role of buildings as part of climate change actions.
APPLAUSE, APPLAUSE? THE NEED TO SUSTAIN MOMENTUM
As demonstrated by the lessons drawn from the Czech New Green Savings programme, building a stable, long-term focus will be critical to the success of initiating a Renovation Wave across Europe. Engaging and co-creating national initiatives with local stakeholders to promote cross-learning and rapid scale-up of successful approaches are some of the promising initiatives.
To reach the scale of activities needed, however, a bottom-up approach based on local enthusiasts will not be enough. It needs to be matched with state-level renovation agencies, which should be given the mandate to effectively address barriers, stimulate interaction and facilitate further uptake of successful initiatives. In addition to overseeing implementation strategies, a Renovation Agency should fulfil the role of effectively linking national stakeholders with capacity in EU institutions such as the Commission, Eurostat and the EIB.
Susanne Dyrboel is also Public Affairs Director, Group Sustainability at ROCKWOOL Group and board member in EuroACE
The views expressed in this opinion are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of FORESIGHT Climate & Energy
Do you have a thoughtful response to the opinion expressed here? Do you have an opinion regarding an aspect of the global energy transition you would like to share with other FORESIGHT readers? If so, please send a short pitch of 200 words and a sentence explaining why you are the right person to deliver this opinion to email@example.com.
A recent World Bank study reveals global carbon revenues are rising sharply, but only around 42% are used for environmental projects. It shows European and American citizens prefer their governments to spend carbon revenues on low-carbon initiatives, so why is political will lagging behind asks Susanne Dyrbøl from Rockwool Group
The world’s building stock is forecast to double in size by 2050 to house a global population of 11 billion. If climate neutrality is also to be met by this date, the construction industry will have to significantly slash emissions from the materials it uses
Europe is moving fast to make the financial innovations required to underpin its Green Deal, write Tom Jess, Policy Advisor, and Kate Levick, Programme Leader, at E3G, an independent climate change think tank
Energy expert Brian Vad Mathiesen from Aalborg University in Denmark describes Vårgårda’s system as a “limousine solution”
Two-thirds of countries do not have energy building codes. This needs to change if buildings are to become part of the solution to the climate crisis, argues Jim Edelson, Director of Codes and Policy at New Buildings Institute, a US-based not-for-profit organisation
Massive investment opportunities exist for those deciding to use their cash to help renovate buildings, says Jennifer Layke, Global Director of Energy at the World Resources Institute