The general election in Denmark is now concluded and we as a society are realigning our political priorities and ambitions based on input from the ballot box. We are looking how we can create a future where much focus will be on the environment and climate. Seen from my chair, the key point from the general election that remains vividly clear is that the Danes voted for the climate.
Denmark already has some sound environmental ambitions, one of the most important being the ambition to become carbon neutral by 2050. This was agreed prior to the elections and enjoyed massive cross-party support in parliament. It also has support from many private businesses, including my own company, Grundfos.
There is, however, room for more ambitious climate action. Not least because we already have a lot of the solutions needed to drive a successful, and efficient, green transition — we just need to use them to their full extent.
Denmark is a leader in renewable energy solutions, we are working hard to push the electrification of society, and we have the knowledge and hardware to support energy efficiency to enable society to consume as little energy as possible and in the smartest way possible.
Energy efficiency often sits as the third, sometimes neglected, element when talking about the green transition. And that is genuinely a shame. Not only is there huge potential to improve energy efficiency in, for example, buildings to achieve our ambitions of emitting less carbon dioxide, but also focusing on — and using — energy efficiency as a tool in the green transition is effective and economically sound.
A recent analysis from Ea Energy Analysis concludes that if we reduce our energy consumption by 33% by 2030 and 45% by 2050, as opposed to only expanding our renewable energy sources, we will reach our goal of becoming energy neutral in 2050 in the cheapest possible way. In fact, the analysis concludes that if we do not, it will cost society up to DKK 160 billion (€21.4 billion) to reach that ambition.
And why are the economy and cost-effective solutions important for the energy transition? Because making the right choices in this regard now will improve our chance of reaching our very necessary climate targets, create a positive spill-over effect on employment, while at the same time leaving more money for welfare. In Denmark, we have several companies specialised in producing, developing and exporting energy efficient solutions. Combined they employ 45,000 people across the country.
We have enormous potential to showcase climate-friendly solutions to the world, which can reduce energy consumption. Unfortunately, we have lost some of our traction in recent years and we cannot any longer rightfully claim to be among the frontrunners. Ambitions and initiatives are lacking and this might mean that we will be surpassed by other countries.
This is bad news for the Danish economy, for Danish exports and for Danish employment. Going green is good business, and this is something countries all over the world have realised.
We need, therefore, to set firm ambitions to pave the way. We need to accept our responsibilities and step up our actions. We owe that to future generations, our children and our grandchildren.
We propose a national and binding goal for energy efficiency of 30% by 2030. This would set a clear course, make it even more realistic that we can reach our important climate ambitions and strengthen the basis for continued world-leading green business in Denmark.
We look to the newly elected politicians to live up to the expectations made clear by Danes in the elections: to give a strong boost to our journey towards a carbon neutral society by 2050; to ensure secure green jobs in Denmark; and to provide the requisite economic power to drive the changes we need in society.
The Social Democrats defeated the incumbent Liberal Party in the Danish national elections on 5 June 2019, a result many saw as a win for climate action
Do you have a thoughtful response to the opinion expressed here? Do you have an opinion regarding an aspect of the global energy transition you would like to share with other FORESIGHT readers? If so, please send a short pitch of 200 words and a sentence explaining why you are the right person to deliver this opinion to email@example.com.
Transforming energy systems will not be enough to decarbonise our economies, argue Janez Potocnik, Co-Chair of the International Resource Panel and Partner at Systemiq, and colleague Julia Okatz. They call for the energy transition to be part of a wider shift to reduce the production of goods and consumption of all natural resources
Significant investment is needed at the development and commercialisation stages
Questions around definitions, targets and the funding of green hydrogen in Europe still need answering
Standards and regulation creating a “closed loop supply chain” could help the wind industry better manage questions around recycling and reuse