The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of FORESIGHT Climate & Energy
There has been growing support in recent years for the concept of stakeholder capitalism and a recognition of the importance of creating long-term value. It is a commitment that, surprisingly to some, has remained strong despite the economic pressures that have risen from the covid-19 pandemic.
Stakeholder capitalism is a philosophy based on the belief that companies have an obligation that goes beyond simply providing returns for shareholders. It suggests that companies should be mindful of, and responsive to, their impact on society and the environment. This can involve: creating secure jobs for employees, embracing sustainable practices, serving customers loyally, cultivating long-term supplier relationships, paying fair taxes or working to minimize the environmental footprint of operations.
This form of inclusive capitalism is not new—it was popular in the 1950s and 1960s—but it is now making a comeback, and this time it is closely linked with ESG issues such as climate change, diversity and human rights. Pre-covid-19 examples of the move away from pure shareholder capitalism include: the Davos Manifesto from the World Economic Forum (WEF), the Business Roundtable’s Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation, and the Embankment Project for Inclusive Capitalism created by the EY organisation and the Coalition for Inclusive Capitalism.
There had been fears that with the emergency response to the pandemic, and with many companies facing an existential crisis, the focus would move away from ESG issues. But, in many respects, the opposite has occurred. It seems the crisis has accelerated the transition to a more purposeful and inclusive capitalism. Although many organisations are in survival mode, ESG issues are likely to remain critical, and essential to resilience and long-term recovery.
When businesses discuss economic risk and significant trends, and when they consider specific threats, such as climate change and pandemics, they tend to take decisive action only when they believe that those risks are likely to impact them in the short term. Now that one of those risks has become a reality, that may change.
Encouragement is not lacking for this change of approach. Pressure is mounting, mainly from the public, with people issues (the “S” in ESG) coming to the fore. Companies that have treated their staff and suppliers well during the crisis have likely improved their corporate reputations and potentially gained more business.
Some companies, however, abandoned their declared purpose as economies started to dip. Such actions may have eroded trust and damaged reputations. Their actions may be remembered by potential customers and may echo in the minds of employees for a long time. It is likely that those companies that did not stand behind their values may lose business and, when economies rebound, their best talent may be looking elsewhere.
Pressure is also coming from the side of governments. Government responses to covid-19 in many countries included large stimulus packages tied to “green outcomes,” with specific focus on accelerating the transition to a zero-carbon economy.
There have also been other, more targeted government interventions. The European Commission’s proposed €750 billion fund to help the bloc recover from the pandemic came with a requirement that 25% be set aside for climate change mitigation.
There is also pressure from companies themselves. A good example is WEF’s recent white paper Measuring Stakeholder Capitalism: Towards Common Metrics and Consistent Reporting of Sustainable Value Creation, which proposed a set of universal ESG metrics that could be published in annual reports. The metrics were created by WEF’s International Business Council (IBC) of leading CEOs in collaboration with professional services firms.
Another example is the Build Back Better movement, where a coalition of CEOs published an open letter calling for the creation of a post-covid-19 global economy that boosts society, the planet and shareholders for future generations. The CEOs want to promote “purpose-first” businesses as a fourth sector of the economy to join the existing public, private and nonprofit sectors.
But, significantly increasing pressure is from investors, who are focusing their attention on ESG issues and stakeholder capitalism. According to Larry Fink, CEO of asset management company BlackRock, the companies that focus on all their stakeholders are going to be the winners in the future. He recently said that stakeholder capitalism is only going to become more important.
The growing significance of ESG issues to investors can be seen in the recent 2020 EY Climate Change and Sustainability Services (CCaSS) Institutional Investor survey. The survey found that, of the 98% of investors surveyed who assess ESG, 72% carry out a structured review of ESG performance, compared with just 32% in the previous survey conducted two years earlier. Moreover, many of those who currently use an informal approach, plan to move to a more rigorous regime (39%).
Institutional investors are aligning their portfolios toward better ESG performance. This signals a different approach from focusing on “responsible funds,” and instead seeing ESG issues as fundamental to the performance for all investments.
In the report, one institutional investor, Vincent Triesschijn from ABN AMRO, sums up the views of many investors. “It is our conviction that companies that perform well on ESG are generally less risky, better positioned for the long term and possibly better prepared for uncertainty,” he says.
Nonfinancial performance is now considered more frequently when investment decisions are made, when compared with the results from the 2018 survey. Around 9 out of 10 investors surveyed say that nonfinancial performance played a pivotal role in their investment decision-making over the previous 12 months.
Looking at the survey findings, it is clear that a focus on ESG performance will likely be critical to success in a post-covid-19 world. Rather than distracting us from the need to drive a sustainable future, the pandemic has helped reinforce the imperative. The covid-19 pandemic has demonstrated the possibility for significant carbon emission reductions and rapid behavioral changes.
The transition to a decarbonised future is likely critical to the long-term resilience of companies, the economy and the planet as a whole. Strong ESG strategies and frameworks should be vital to economic recovery and for companies to thrive in the long term.
ENERGY SECTOR OPPORTUNITIES
Different pressures are now converging to create the market conditions for rapid transformation within sectors. Energy is a prime example. Alongside regulatory support for renewables, and an ever-decreasing cost base for solar, wind and battery-storage solutions, stakeholder forces are focusing on decarbonisation and the realignment of assets toward lower-carbon alternatives.
By 2040, according to the International Energy Agency, over half of all electricity supply will be from low-carbon sources. With increasing demand for electrification of transport and industrial processes, and greater funding through green bonds and green loans, opportunities for this sector to capitalise on decarbonisation should be plentiful.
Companies that focus on ESG issues and realign themselves to the stakeholder capitalism agenda may have a competitive advantage over those that try to return to business as usual.
This Publication contains information in summary form and is therefore intended for general guidance only. It is not intended to be a substitute for detailed research or the exercise of professional judgment. Member firms of the global EY organisation cannot accept responsibility for loss to any person relying on this article.
The views expressed by the author are their own and not necessarily those of Ernst & Young LLP or other members of the global EY organisation. Moreover, they should be seen in the context of the time they were made.
Neither Ernst & Young LLP nor any member firm thereof shall bear any responsibility for the content, accuracy or security of any third-party websites that are linked (by way of hyperlink or otherwise) in this article.
This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax or other professional advice. Please refer to your advisors for specific advice.
Do you have a thoughtful response to the opinion expressed here? Do you have an opinion regarding an aspect of the global energy transition you would like to share with other FORESIGHT readers? If so, please send a short pitch of 200 words and a sentence explaining why you are the right person to deliver this opinion to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Research into energy poverty initiatives often ignores society’s most vulnerable groups. In order to fulfill the just transition, all members of society across geography, gender and income need to be included, says Sergio Tirado Herrero of the Institute of Environmental Science and Technologies (ICTA) at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB) and the EmpowerMed research project
The global pandemic has bought us more time to make the changes necessary to avoid catastrophic climate change. But innovation solutions need to have a global appeal to be truly impactful, says Elena Bou, Innovation Director at EIT InnoEnergy
The most sought after building insulation products will not necessarily be the cheapest and most effective, but those manufactured with the lightest carbon footprint
The big names of the corporate world will not achieve the energy transition alone. Companies of all sizes have a part to play
A big part of speeding up the move away from fossil fuels is scaling up innovation and technology. With an appetite for riskier projects, philanthropic foundations could play an important role in raising some much needed cash