Much as in the energy transition debate, the big question is who pays for carbon removal
REALITY CHECK
Stopping runaway climate change could require the use of controversial technologies that suck already emitted carbon out of the atmosphere
OPTIONS
There are two overarching options for carbon removal: natural (trees) and technological. Picking the best solution rests on its potential to remove carbon, the permanence of that removal and cost. Competition for resources, notably land and biomass, also needs to be considered
KEY QUOTE
These are complex questions. We need a better understanding of what we actually need to do
Climate change is the number one policy priority of the new European Commission, the EU’s administrative body, that came into office at the end of 2019. The European Green Deal, unveiled on December 11, is more than just a climate policy. It will define the executive’s five-year mandate, including policies for jobs, growth and the EU’s ability to compete against other world blocs. At the heart of the Green Deal is the goal for Europe’s energy consumption to be carbon neutral and achieve “net zero” greenhouse gas emissions by mid-century. All EU member states except Poland have signed up to the net-zero goal and the Commission has promised to cement it in law. A legislative proposal, which will not need Poland’s approval to pass, is due in March 2020.
...
Try FORESIGHT - 30 days for €29
Open source software can facilitate sector coupling through vehicle-to-grid or building-to-grid technology
The launch of the Santiago Action Plan at the COP25 meeting in Madrid by finance ministers is an important step to ensure finance ministries play their role in accelerating the zero carbon transition, says Dileimy Orozco Policy Advisor at E3G
Pollution is causing seagrass growing on our ocean floors to retreat. Scientists believe the habitat could be an important carbon sink and are working to restore it
A recent World Bank study reveals global carbon revenues are rising sharply, but only around 42% are used for environmental projects. It shows European and American citizens prefer their governments to spend carbon revenues on low-carbon initiatives, so why is political will lagging behind asks Susanne Dyrbøl from Rockwool Group
The overproducing cement sector is a low-hanging fruit that could help China curb its vast carbon emissions
Carbon capture and storage may be needed to decarbonise highly polluting sectors such as steel production, but the power sector would be best advised to focus on renewables and efficiency given the significant costs of the technology