There is absolutely no excuse to delay investing increasing amounts of carbon revenues in energy efficiency, say Richard Cowart and Catharina Wiese from the Regulatory Assistance Project
Europe is racing to meet ambitious 2030 and 2050 climate goals, but is still stumbling over one of the foundation stones of a cost-effective clean energy transition —investments in end-use energy efficiency. While this month’s “yellow vest” protests in France are not focused on the emissions trading system (ETS), they are a striking reminder of how hard it is to meet climate goals just by raising the cost of energy. Carbon prices are important, but we also need energy-saving programmes that deliver bill savings and cleaner air for citizens, and more competitive economies for EU member states.
The European Parliament recently ratified the Energy Efficiency Directive, which calls for continued progress on energy efficiency to 2030, following the “efficiency first” principle. But recent research reveals that member states are already failing to meet efficiency goals established for 2020. Happily, there are huge opportunities to save both carbon and money through energy savings such as renovated buildings, new industrial processes, advanced lighting and similar measures. The missing ingredient is capital. Europe needs public funds to draw forth private capital to deliver efficient energy services to families and businesses across Europe. Fortunately, the perfect source of investment capital exists, carbon revenues from ETS auctions.
The EU has long encouraged member states to dedicate at least half of their carbon revenues to climate purposes and there is ample experience across Europe on ways to invest ETS receipts. These include energy savings programmes like the business and residential refurbishment loans funded by the German KfW bank and the French Habitat Milieu housing programme, which delivers energy savings improvements to housing for lower-income families. Supports for renewable energy are also common across the EU. Unfortunately this money sometimes also ends up backing projects that that do not reduce emissions, such as national budget deficit reductions and direct subsidies to energy-intensive industries. RAP’s research on carbon revenue recycling reveals that only one quarter of revenues received in 2016 were reinvested in energy efficiency. Since deep efficiency is essential to the energy transition, can deliver direct benefits to families and businesses, but is difficult to deliver at scale without public support, we can and should invest much more. The good news is that new carbon receipts that could drive higher efficiency gains are now becoming available.
Economic recovery and recent reforms to the ETS have pushed up emission allowance prices more than three-fold, from as low as €5 a tonne in 2017 to around €18 a tonne at the end of 2018. With future increases expected, it is possible that as much as €10 billion a year could be available to EU countries to fund enhanced energy efficiency programmes.
The recent increase in total carbon revenues is not just a short-term blip. It is due to structural reform of the ETS: the creation of the market stability reserve, aimed at eliminating the historic surplus of emissions allowances; the prospect of permanent retirements after 2023; and the continued reduction of the cap toward 2030. Carbon revenues can be a significant source of public funding for long-term energy efficiency programmes that will magnify the carbon-reduction effects of the ETS while lowering energy bills for families, businesses and EU nations.
Experts agree that we cannot deliver rapid decarbonisation with supply-side energy solutions alone. Energy efficiency must play a key role in accelerating decarbonisation efforts. Fatih Birol of the International Energy Agency, says: “The right efficiency policies could enable the world to achieve more than 40% of the emissions cuts needed to reach its climate goals without new technology.” Capturing the untapped and cost-effective potential for energy efficiency improvements should logically be a major goal of climate policy. But many efficiency opportunities, such as buildings renovations and home heating improvements, and even industrial motors and commercial lighting retrofits, are blocked by non-price barriers that make many efficiency savings difficult to capture through market drivers alone.
A pricing instrument like the ETS does not deliver the savings that, in theory, it might. But well-designed efficiency programmes using carbon revenues can deliver as much as seven to nine times more carbon reduction than a carbon price alone. This is because they can overcome behavioural, financing and legal barriers to efficiency investments. The resulting energy savings will also deliver multiple dividends in the way of additional emission reductions and reduced energy bills for consumers. They will also deliver a range of non-energy benefits such as health and air quality improvements, job creation and European energy security.
Since 2014, member states have been required to report annually on their carbon revenues from ETS auctions and how they are used. RAP has taken a close look at these reports for 2016. In that year, EU countries received €3.8 billion in carbon revenues. According to member state reports, around 61% of the total revenues were recycled for climate and energy purposes, as defined in the ETS directive. This percentage includes all reported strategic investments, excluding amounts from countries that do not earmark their revenues for specific uses. Even a quick look at these reports shows there is room for improvement. Over 38% of total 2016 carbon revenues were not strategically used for energy and climate purposes, and only about one-quarter of available revenues were used to promote energy efficiency. Moreover, due to the broad latitude given to member states, the reporting does not demonstrate whether spending is additional to that which would have occurred anyway.
On a more positive note, the study reveals that several countries devote a substantial share of their carbon revenues to energy efficiency. Nine report using at least 50% of their carbon receipts for energy efficiency programmes, with France reporting a full 100%. RAP’s assessment of the programmes funded in part by carbon revenues in Latvia, Germany and the Czech Republic shows that carbon-funded efficiency improvements can deliver both emissions reductions and cost savings to consumers, along with tax revenues to national budgets, clean energy jobs and economic growth.
Carbon cap-and-trade regimes in other regions also show that carbon revenues invested in high-value energy savings programmes yield myriad benefits. A leading example is the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), which caps emissions from power stations across nine northeastern states in the US. This region, on its own, would be the sixth largest economy in the world. The RGGI states have routinely devoted about 55% of their carbon receipts to energy efficiency programmes. In RGGI’s first six years, these delivered over $1.5 billion in energy bill savings and over $2.76 billion in net economic gains, while reducing emissions faster than expected and at a net negative cost to consumers per tonne avoided.
Deeper energy savings are an obvious, powerful and affordable part of Europe’s climate strategy. The good news is that we know how to capture them. Some countries are already leading the way. By increasing the amount of ETS revenues invested in energy efficiency, we reduce emissions, benefit consumers and businesses, and advance the energy transition. What are we waiting for?
Do you have a thoughtful response to the opinion expressed here? Do you have an opinion regarding an aspect of the global energy transition you would like to share with other FORESIGHT readers? If so, please send a short pitch of 200 words and a sentence explaining why you are the right person to deliver this opinion to firstname.lastname@example.org.
With the right regulations and better understanding of the advantages of wind and solar over other asset classes, investors can play a key role in speeding up the transition to a clean energy economy
Whether self-driving cars are a help or a hindrance to efforts to reduce transport emissions will depend on the rules, planning and pricing structures that accompany its introduction, argue Sami Angsthelm and Giel Mertens from Bax & Company
Belgium’s complicated political structures keep the country’s climate action ambition low. Mars, a US corporation, is showing the way forward with 100% renewable energy and greener transport
Carbon capture and storage may be needed to decarbonise highly polluting sectors such as steel production, but the power sector would be best advised to focus on renewables and efficiency given the significant costs of the technology
California is leading efforts to make the transition from combustion engines to electric vehicles fair and just for all including low-income groups
While solutions are being found to many of the technological issues that have challenged wave power, the industry is still struggling to justify the investment required compared to the potential electricity generated
Leave a Reply